“Portrait
of a Man in Evening Dress”
by
James Abbott McNeill Whistler (c. 1885 )
Home
Alone with
Take-Out
Theater
by
Jamie Jobb
Not
unlike maƮtre d's and chefs, theater people locked
down at home by pandemic virus have been exploring unique plots to
ply their craft in a world where Nobody’s In The House. So, as
menus and playbills gather dust, restaurants are relying on Grubhub
or DoorDash while performers are choosing platforms like Zoom
or YouTube to convey their programs to folks ordering take-out
theater at home.
It’s
as if the internet
has turned
show business
inside out:
where The Audience now
seems to be
the focus and everybody
just wants a
role as casual
content-providing
performer
“interviewed” at-home.
More of a
tour
than
an actual
“show”
– with lights,
action, special values
of live production.
Stuck in its own
seat, the
homebound audient
just wants
to chat with
itself?
What’s
up with that?
A
few critics
have begun to
imply the
Zoom performance
model
lacks legs,
as we say. Here’s Cleo
Levin explaining that feeling
in Slate:
“The truth is, no
matter how much technology gets involved, I can’t pretend that I’m
at a night
club when I’m in the same sweatpants I’ve been wearing for
two weeks (and I am too stubborn to get dressed up when I will,
technically, be alone). I cannot shake the feeling of loneliness with
flat images of my friends on a screen. I’ve realized how much
someone’s physical presence matters—how important it is to
actually have the bulk of another person beside you, the little
noises they make, their micro-expressions, the ability to follow
their gaze and see what they’re looking at.”
Exactly
– to feel like we’re part of an actual “live” audience in
“real time”, not pixel prisoners of broadband short attention
spans!
Then
there are the artistic directors and performers themselves, many of
whom seem to believe they’re appearing on Facebook instead of on
stage. They chat rather than perform! Like “talking heads”
– and we don’t mean David Byrne’s great band.
Also,
very few on-line players seem to have full awareness of where their
“camera” is … particularly on a cellphone or a pad where more
than one “lens” stares back at The Talent. This is a fatal
mistake. It squelches any intimacy when a performer seems to be
looking askance, or beyond us. We wonder: “Are they
lost?”
Video
veterans know the camera is no casual observer. It sees your eyes
most of all. Any savvy on-line performer MUST account for that
essential narrative “eye-line match” in performance. Otherwise
the actor appears a little “nuts”, or at least clueless as
toWHERE the
audience actually sits, which could be literally ANYWHERE.
Plus,
can’t anybody think about home studio lighting? Even stuck-at-home
professional cable-news talking heads don’t know how to light
themselves in front of their bookcases and framed artworks. It’s
as if COVID-19 is attacking the central nervous system of performance
itself!
I
recently suffered through several local live-stream theater “events”,
some of them involving performers and companies I’d seen many times
on stage in San Francisco and Berkeley. None of these nascent
“shows” on line seem even remotely dramatic.
One
of them was a big disappointment, by a solo performer I know who’s
incredible live – he can recreate the feeling of a neighborhood
parade complete with marching band and crowded street, all by
himself. I’ve seen him feed off his audience free-range in The
House; but home-alone in his living room, this performer falls flat
in live-stream.
We
can tell his performance “chops” are not there, obviously. He’s
NOT looking at us – he seems totally unaware of his “camera”.
This casual “hang-out” show ain’t actually performance.
An even worse example of muddled laptop tv is an enfeebled effort at Virtual Audience Humor called “Bill Maher's Home Box Office". This sheltered-in-place-show tanks at the very top because it's so obviously faked-as-fake, that it's not funny. Maher’s disingenuous post-ironic eye-line view of an obviously absent and historically disconnected "audience" destroys any semblance of humor he can muster as a live-streamer. We see right through his fluffery.
But
these incipient
prototypes will
improve once home-bound
theatre folk begin
to think like filmmakers. Below are two
excellent recent
examples of how
digital video may
be used to heightened theatrical effect on
line – well
beyond what anyone
could see if
seated in The
House. The
first is a solo performance by
an
acting
author who relied
on a couple of friends to accomplish his modest live-stream debut.
The second is a Shakespearean
extravaganza which clearly demonstrates
The Royal National
Theatre’s
decade-long commitment
to broadcasting
live works from
London to audiences seated elsewhere around
the globe.
*
* *
Paul
Sussman shows he understands “eye-line match” in live-stream show
1.
Paul
Sussman’s
“Listen
Up, Jimmy Carter!”
(23
minutes)
Performing
playwright Paul Sussman likes to say he honed his quills for farce
and melodrama during a long career in non-profit financial
management. That’s not as oxymoronic a punchline as it appears,
particularly in the Bay Area where Silicon Valley largess flows onto
tax-sheltered ledgers of social change. This insider’s knowledge
grounds Sussman’s unique world view.
I
met Paul two decades ago in a Charlie
Varon workshop
in San Francisco. Among Charlie’s students, Paul’s work stood
out for his ability to quickly pull focus, jump cut and still keep
his story on track. Like Rafa Nadal scrambling to chase a
cross-court half-volley drop-shot at net in The French Open.
A
Monday Night
Marsh veteran, Sussman also mined his developmental experience as
a student/political activist, which fed the premise of his “Listen
Up, Jimmy Carter!” – recently live-streamed
on his YouTube channel.
An
initial tech glitch paused Paul at the start. But once his narrative
kicked in, it became clear the man has a knack for commanding a
computer screen. He knows how to “make” closeups. His body can
get physical when he has to say something his words alone cannot
convey.
Sussman
has written and performed well over a dozen pieces at the Marsh and
elsewhere. But this was his first fully-developed solo performance
in the acting author’s living room where, like the rest of
California, he’d been ordered to stay by governor Gavin Newsom.
Set
in his
May 1976 memories
of Baltimore, Sussman
acknowledges
his story is chronologically
anachronistic. “It
was a different time ... Politics was different. 1976 – it was
crazy! A nightmare of a president had just been defiling the office,
wreaking havoc on the land, dragged kicking and screaming into an
impeachment process which the Republicans sabotaged at every turn.
(he moves in for a closeup with
a nod toward current events)
… It was a different time!”
Within
the first two minutes
of the piece, Paul produced
a Jimmy Carter bobble-head,
which he directly
addresses as a
“capitalist-tool peanut-farming fraud”.
Carter was the “feel-good moderate” frontrunner among a
mass of 15 candidates in the Democratic primary for president that
year. Sussman, a Michigan radical Peace Corps volunteer, opposed
everything midstream Naval Academy Lieutenant Carter represented.
Truth to Power, and all that.
At
one priceless moment in the short piece, Sussman pulls out what must
be his most prized possessions as a writer: his own journal from when
he was six-years-old! He clearly delights to read his own youthful
“flowery prose” documenting the day JFK came to town on a
train: “How caboose! So cool! But I fear
Kennedy's charisma may obscure the neocolonialist Cold War wolf
hiding in the sheep’s clothing of volunteerism.”
Indeed,
kid ... You go get ‘em!
Let’s
hope Paul continues his in-house performances. As expected, he’s
set a very high bar for himself and everyone else. To track what
Paul Sussman is doing, subscribe to his YouTube channel:
Even a living room has
depth-of-field when it comes to performance space
Sussman
used fixed camera to great effect, creating “closeups” by
moving into it
* * *
“Some
are born great,
some
achieve greatness, and
some
have greatness thrust upon them.”
-- William Shakespeare
Stunning
stagecraft commands The Royal National Theatre’s “Twelfth
Night”
2.
William
Shakespeare’s
“Twelfth
Night” or “What You Will”
(two
hours, forty-three minutes)
In
2009, The Royal National Theatre introduced its first season of what
has become internationally renowned as “National Theatre Live”
now recast by the pandemic as “National
Theatre At Home”.
Long
before any COVID-19 lockdowns, these programs were professionally
broadcast from The National stage(s) into cinemas and theaters across
the planet. Depending on end-point venues, the plays were streamed
simultaneously with the London performance. In some time zones, the
show was delayed to more timely coincide with a local audience
otherwise asleep when the play originally aired in London.
National
Theatre At Home recently offered live-stream viewers worldwide an
incredible gift – a free screening of William
Shakespeare’s comedy of mistaken identifications -- “Twelfth
Night” on YouTube. This was no light, midsummer night’s
entertainment, filmed as it was before a live audience in April 2017,
when such crowds were able to assemble. The almost three-hour
production was so vividly intense that we watched it twice over four
nights.
As
suggested by the vibrant YouTube screen captures posted herein, the
stagecraft is spectacular in The Olivier Theater where spectacular
stagecraft is the hallmark. The Olivier’s well-rounded floor-plan
harkens to Greek amphitheaters which were designed democratically –
every seat meant to be within earshot of actors speaking behind masks
without microphones.
Soutra
Gilmour’s astonishingly flexible set was designed around the pivot
point of the Olivier’s concentric-ringed rotating stages – A set
of three interlocking staircases, all framed together and each
opening up to provide varied backgrounds for the action. All at
once, the set suddenly became a shipwreck, a hospital, a gymnasium, a
courtyard, a pool and spa, a brick-walled street, a prison, a patio,
a night club, a chapel, an orchard, a topiary garden. The overall
design allows for most fluid transitions as players move from one
scene to the next.
The
excellent cast of twenty actors proved itself very nimble afoot and
aface for such a dynamic production. Indeed, two of the seven
members of the show’s creative team were the choreographer (Shelly
Maywell) and the fight coordinator (Kev McCurdy). The opening
shipwreck scene clearly demonstrates the serious circus training
these actors needed to be able to pull off this play on this stage.
With
a stage crew of 54 and a broadcast crew of 56, the Royal National’s
profound production values are on fulsome display here. It’s easy
to subscribe to the program on YouTube and each performance is backed
up with tons of background video – enough for any serious theater
student to acquire a virtual doctorate without paying one cent of
tuition.
Next
up for National Theater At Home the incredible two-faced
“Frankenstein”
Malvolia (Tamsin Greig)
confronts Maria (Niky Wardley) as Sir Andrew waits
Malvolia
(Tamsin Greig) enters in “yellow stockings with cross-garters”